CLASS 1A
1[/B]. Cashmere 0.408
2[/B]. Royal 0.597
3[/B]. Hoquiam 0.709
4[/B]. Montesano 1.361
5[/B]. La Center 1.548
6[/B]. Eatonville 1.628
7[/B]. Quincy 1.881
8[/B]. Charles Wright Academy 1.947
9[/B]. Mount Baker 1.995
10[/B]. Woodland 2.004
Others[/B]: Freeman 2.010, Cle Elum/Roslyn 2.037, King's 2.056, Cascade of Leavenworth 2.406, River View 2.477.
Now this is even getting more comical with King's at 13...you can talk about the not so good 6 teams they played but I still have a difficult time understanding how a team beats 2A Lynden (ranked 1 at the time), 2A ATM (ranked 1 at the time) and 2A Lakewood (ranked 2 or 3 at the time) and still have this poor of a computer ranking....the computer needs to grow some eye balls and watch a couple games I think.
Read more here: http://blog.thenewstribune.com/preps/2012/10/30/computer-rankings-alas-skyline-surpasses-kentwood-at-no-1-in-4a/#storylink=cpy
1[/B]. Cashmere 0.408
2[/B]. Royal 0.597
3[/B]. Hoquiam 0.709
4[/B]. Montesano 1.361
5[/B]. La Center 1.548
6[/B]. Eatonville 1.628
7[/B]. Quincy 1.881
8[/B]. Charles Wright Academy 1.947
9[/B]. Mount Baker 1.995
10[/B]. Woodland 2.004
Others[/B]: Freeman 2.010, Cle Elum/Roslyn 2.037, King's 2.056, Cascade of Leavenworth 2.406, River View 2.477.
Now this is even getting more comical with King's at 13...you can talk about the not so good 6 teams they played but I still have a difficult time understanding how a team beats 2A Lynden (ranked 1 at the time), 2A ATM (ranked 1 at the time) and 2A Lakewood (ranked 2 or 3 at the time) and still have this poor of a computer ranking....the computer needs to grow some eye balls and watch a couple games I think.
Read more here: http://blog.thenewstribune.com/preps/2012/10/30/computer-rankings-alas-skyline-surpasses-kentwood-at-no-1-in-4a/#storylink=cpy